More on law schools and job prospects

The latest in the War on Law Schools comes in the form of a Tennessee student who said that her law school was negligent because they admitted her to the school. Because she hadn’t completed her undergraduate work, she won’t be eligible to take the bar exam, get a job as a lawyer, and eventually shed nearly $80K in student loans.

A few thoughts on this:

Further, claiming that you aren’t qualified and that it’s your school’s fault may not be a great career-building strategy. 


Whelmed is an archaic word

A VP at a former company used to say, “The easy stuff should be easy.” The idea was that our energies, time, and money should flow toward the hard problems. Sandra has another way of phrasing it, creating a Jetsons type of life. The ordinary things can be automatic. Sounds great, until we remember how the show ended, with George shouting, “Jane, stop this crazy thing.”
This, as you might have guessed by now, has been an odd week. Some things have gone quiet well. My course on social networking started yesterday. The class is interested, engaged, and fun. (Reminder: if you are going to do a live demo of your Facebook page, expect the unexpected. The people in the class were good-humored about the picture of the swearing cat that showed up in one FB post.)
Other work has been a struggle. A couple of writing assignments stumbled and needed rewrites. A web project is stalled. I’m overdue on a couple of reports for another project. Stuff like that. Nothing really bad in and of itself, but, the whole is more than the sum of the parts.

20120209-083213.jpg
So, today I’m feeling whelmed, which, I’ve learned, is a word we don’t use unless we need it.


Hello world again!

Because I have several projects due and overdue, I thought it would be a great time to move RoasterBoy again. Because the blog is now on my own host, I have access to many more work-avoidance features and widgets.

Thanks to all who’ve stayed with me for all these years. I hope that I continue to be worthy of your time and attention.


More on Mitt Romney and historic events

When Mitt Romney 60% of the voters in  New Hampshire’s primary didn’t vote for Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor declared, “Tonight we made history.” History, in this context, was manufactured because political wonks discovered that Romney is the first Republican non-incumbent presidential candidate to win nominating contests in both Iowa and New Hampshire.

No, my friends,  last Tuesday’s “historic” moment is as historic as Al Bundy’s four touchdowns in a high school football game. It’s the worst kind of political geekery that passes for analysis, made even worse when raised up by a candidate on a national stage.

No, my friends, history was made with:

  • the march on Selma to Montgomery in 1965
  • the march on Washington in 1963
  • the march on the Pentagon in 1968
  • Juneteenth in 1865
  • Nelson Mandela’s walk from prison in 1990
  • the ratification of the Bill of Rights in 1791
  • the election of a black president in 2008

This history-is-waiting tidbit started showing up a couple of months ago. I haven’t verified that Jim Geraghty’s column in NRO, War-Gaming the GOP Early Contests, Six Weeks Out, is the very first mention, but it’s among the earliest. The factoid gained momentum after Mitt’s presumed eight-vote triumph in Iowa. It was held high by the candidate, much as a fifth-grader would raise a blue ribbon for the best bug collection.

All around the world, people are fighting and dying for the right to have a government of their choosing. Should we warn them that it’s is what their future could be?

We, for varying values of we, are idiots.


More on job searches – helping people help us

David Stone, a VP at DEC, once said, “Let’ make new mistakes.” The idea is that we should have already learned what we can from our old mistakes and now it’s time to take new risks, some of which will certainly generate a fresh crop of, um, fine learning experiences.
So, it was quite humbling when I read a transcript of discussion between a job-seeker and an executive who was offering help and guidance.
When asked what she was looking for in a job, the job-seeker replied, “Anything, really. I just want it to be a good a fit.
Urp.
A week before, I wrote the following in an email to a friend who was helping me make contact with a company, “Regarding your question about what I’d ideally like to do – I want to be useful.”
This is a noble aspirations that does little to help the other person be helpful.
There are times and places to let your thoughts wander over rolling vistas that your life has been and will be. This wasn’t one of them.

When someone is offering help with a job search, give them something they can work with.


More on education

The good teachers, though, helped me not only learn new material, but also how to learn. They taught me to read better, glue a bunch of ideas into a new framework, and then write better.

You’d think, with all of the time that I’ve spent in college classrooms, I would have figured out what parts of education lead to success and what is a waste of time and money. I’m guessing that you’d think that, because I know that I do.
I can identify a half dozen great teachers, professors who knew their material very well and were able to engage me so that I became excited about learning what they knew. Most of the others are deservedly unmemorable.
So, how come an academic career in the liberal arts led to a career in high tech? Until the time that it happened (and for long while afterwards), no one would have predicted it.
Recently, our thinking about the relationship between cholesterol and heart disease was upended. Researchers verified that raising HDL (good cholesterol) levels made no difference in the progression of heart disease in patients who started out with low HDL levels. People with low HDL typically are more likely to have heart disease, but raising their HDL doesn’t help them much.
We can correlate a factor with a condition, but changing that factor doesn’t affect the outcome of the condition.
Data suggest antidepressants score slightly ahead of placebos, A doctor prescribes antidepressants, but only one patient in eight will do better with the medication than with a placebo. And, theplacebos are getting stronger.
Our ability to predict who will benefit from something is slightly better than doing nothing, but telling them we’re doing something. For example, psychologist Ellen Langer showed that telling people that they were living a healthy lifestyle could result in the people acting that way. 
It’s long been a given that people with more education tend to be happier, wealthier, and healthier. (Your mileage, of course, will vary.)  It appears that we can get more people to college by expanding opportunities at community colleges, graduate programs, and for-profit institutions. And what happens?

  • Law students have discovered that their new law degrees will leave them with massive amounts of nondischargeable debt. On that realization, they are suing a law school for leading them to believe that law school was a good deal. It almost amounts to Promissory estoppel, inducing someone to do something based on implication.
  • New federal regulations will require that for-profit educational programs yield “gainful employment.’’  
  • Venture Capitalist Peter Thiel recently awarded two dozen $100K grants to students who chose to leave college to do real work.

It appears that we’ve identified many factors to happiness, wealth, and happiness. Some of the factors, such as race, gender, family size, and birth order are, once set, pretty much immutable. Others can change by individual effort and societal support, such as education, physical appearance, opportunity for work, and on-going support. Still others are governed by luck, good or bad, at certain times.
Even if we can identify the factors for success, our efforts don’t have success that rise much above chance outcomes.
Personally, I’m surprisingly at peace with this. Most of the stuff that I predicted for my life didn’t come true; most of the time it’s been better than I’d expected. The things that went wrong, well, some came with valuable life lessons, and some were just wrong and have stayed broken. More on that another time.


More on poker, True Finns, and the presidential, er, um …

Various about government and politics that you may have missed or wished you had.


More on work

My Linkedin connections have ratcheted up their activity level since the start of the new year. At last count, my associates collectively posted more than 750 status updates. Most of the activity is the result of people making new connections.
When one person shows a lot of new connections, it’s often an indicator that the person has or is about to lose a job. When there’s a squall like this, from people at different companies, something else is going on. I suspect, but can’t confirm yet, that this is a good sign. People who have jobs are looking for better jobs or at least are thinking about it. They’re wondering who among their connections is doing what.
People aren’t finding the kinds of steady jobs of old. Those jobs and the expectations for same ended probably 20 years ago. Tom Peters predicted it in the 80s and has ridden the wave of New Work for a pretty good career. He used to say that your career was your Rolodex (back when folks knew what one was), that you always needed to be thinking about how you’d be assembling a job based on your personal connections. Companies, too, would be developing virtual, ad hoc teams that would come together for quick projects and dissemble with no hard feelings.

Of course, lots of people have made a living with all kinds for a long time. Recently, a guy has received a lot of attention for admitting that he wrote college papers for pay. (These folks have an, um, interesting name for their company in this line of business.) Some 40 years ago, I did the same. I didn’t write many and probably made only a few hundred bucks. I did  guarantee a B. My big advantage was that I could type, making it easier for the customer who didn’t have to recopy the text into his (it was all guys) handwriting. It might be the only typewritten paper that the student ever handed in, but in a big school, no one noticed.
Funny thing. I was bombing out of my own courses even as I wrote B papers in sociology, English, and history. Karma generally finds you, eh?


More on winter

We’ve had a few days of below-freezing weather with a couple more in the queue. There’ll be a warm-up on Sunday and Monday, bringing freezing glop that turns to hydraulic cement early next week.

via Wunder Blog : Weather Underground

We’ve rearranged a few rooms in our house. I now have a different BlogCave off of our family room. The wood stove provides enough warmth; I’ve not had to turn on the heat, yet.

When the snow is covering the back window, we’ll have better insulation. Until then, the sharp northwest winds alert us to each little gap that we missed in our last weatherization project.
Nature plays hard and wants to win.


More on reporters as opinionators

Nicole tells a fine story, A Confession « Nicole, Worcester,  about helping her grandmother vote during 2002. It’s an excellent response to the column by Nick Kotsopoulos, Ballot help defies spirit of the law.
Voting isn’t a social studies MCAS test where you have to demonstrate that you, unaided, know the answers. It’s an act of civic participation whereby each voter expresses a viewpoint on the candidates and issues at hand. In town meetings, we vote in public, with plenty of opportunity to chat before and during the vote. Those votes are as legally binding as ballots on election day. Similarly, people can vote by absentee ballot, at home or wherever, with all manner of assistance and with no real time constraints. 
Our voting processes are complex and imprecise. We try to balance the rights of groups to voice their opinions, of individuals to act according to their consciences, and of the general public to know that the votes were counted as accurately as humanly possible.
We’re coming up on the 10th anniversary of Bush v. Gore in which activist judges decided that the state of Florida should stop counting the votes in the 2000 presidential election because the Florida Supreme Court erred in its scheme to fashion a recount and that there wasn’t time to create a new scheme that met constitutional requirements.

via Ballot help defies spirit of the law

So, people vote for many reasons and in many ways. Governments and others determine how the votes are tallied. As I said, our processes are complex and imprecise. We’re trying to bring as many people into the process as we can. Yes, we need to do so legally. We’re not helped by snarky comments about voters who are new to the process and uncertain about what to do. Particularly when those comments are made by an otherwise good political reporter.